← Three short discoveries on WatWat
Pink pigs lying pressed together in a dirt yard beneath a shelter
Brain and body

Loaches and some other aquatic animals breathe through their intestines when the water runs short of oxygen. Whether a mammalian gut could be pressed into the same service has been genuinely controversial. So one group tested two versions in animal models of respiratory failure: oxygen gas delivered into the rectum, and an oxygenated liquid. Mice and pigs first, then safety work in rats. Did any oxygen reach the circulation?

Tested in animals

Both routes rescued the animals. Intra-rectal oxygen gas and oxygenated liquid each provided vital rescue in experimental respiratory failure, improving survival, behavior and systemic oxygen levels in mouse and pig models. Rodent and porcine studies found the enema-like liquid procedure tolerable and repeatable, with no major signs of complications. The authors note that perfluorochemicals already have an established safety record in clinical use.

Several aquatic organisms, loaches among them, have evolved intestinal breathing to survive in water with little oxygen. Whether could be adapted to a mammal, using the gut as an additional site for gas exchange, has been highly controversial. The appeal is obvious: a route to the bloodstream that bypasses the lungs entirely.

Two modes were tested in an experimental model of respiratory failure. One delivered oxygen gas into the rectum directly. The other used liquid ventilation with oxygenated perfluorocarbon, an inert fluid that carries a great deal of dissolved oxygen and already has a clinical safety record.

After inducing , the team analyzed both approaches in mouse and pig, then ran in rat. Both intra-rectal oxygen gas and oxygenated liquid delivery provided vital rescue, improving survival, behavior and systemic oxygen levels.

The rodent and porcine work confirmed that the enema-like liquid procedure was tolerable and repeatable, with no major signs of complications. The authors propose it as a potential adjunctive means of oxygenation for patients in respiratory distress, which is the right framing for a result in three species of animal. No human has been treated this way here, and preclinical safety is the first step of a long road rather than evidence of clinical benefit.

wat. Oxygen delivered into the rectum reached the bloodstream and kept animals in respiratory failure alive, in mice and in pigs.

wat wat

Mechanical ventilation is scarce, invasive and sometimes insufficient. A route that oxygenates the blood without touching the airway would be an adjunct rather than a replacement, and the pandemic made the shortage concrete.

How do we know?

Okabe and colleagues induced type 1 respiratory failure in animal models, then tested intra-rectal oxygen gas ventilation and liquid ventilation with oxygenated perfluorocarbon in mouse and pig, followed by preclinical safety analysis in rat.

Tested in animalsPeer-reviewed study

What is still unknown

Mice, pigs and rats. Nothing here is a human result, and preclinical safety in rodents is the beginning of a path to the clinic rather than evidence that it works in a patient.

Learn something?

Okabe et al., Med· 2021· DOI 10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.004

Where to next

Does a placebo still work if you are told up front that it is one?medicineWhich cell in your body gives up its own nucleus?oxygenCan reading a list out loud before surgery keep people alive?medicine

Want another one worth repeating?

Start with three short discoveries. No sign-up, nothing to pick first.

Surprise me
Browse the topic libraryAbout WatWat, and how sources get checked