← Three short discoveries on WatWat
An open dictionary on a table
Psychology

The sense that a word is right on the tip of your tongue feels like a complete failure of memory. To find out whether that is right, researchers drove people into the state deliberately with definitions of rare words, and then asked them what they did know. What did they know?

Tested in people

A surprising amount. People in that state name the opening letter, the number of syllables and where the stress falls, far above chance. So this is and not a failure: the meaning has arrived and the sound has not been assembled. It supports a model in which runs in two separate stages, and the tip-of-the-tongue state is the fault that exposes the seam between them.

The first impression is of a failure: the word did not arrive. The finding inverts that, and shows a partial success that stopped halfway.

The way to test it is to manufacture the state on purpose. Participants are given definitions of rare words, and you wait for the moment they feel the word is on the . Then, before they remember it, you ask them to guess things about it.

And they guess correctly, far above chance: the first letter, the number of syllables, the position of the stress. Which is to say parts of the sound are available in memory, without the full sequence that joins them.

That supports a model in which speech production runs in two separate stages: first the unit carrying the meaning is selected, and only after it is the sound form retrieved. Normally all of this runs in under half a second with no way to see it. The tip-of-the-tongue state is the fault that exposes the seam. The qualification is that most of the research was done on English speakers, and the matters: in a language like Hebrew, built on a root and a pattern, what is kept may be different.

wat. The meaning of the word has already arrived. Only its sound has not been assembled.

wat wat

The phenomenon is a rare window into the intermediate stages of speech production, a process that normally runs far too fast to watch.

How do we know?

Brown and McNeill documented the phenomenon systematically: they brought participants into the state deliberately, then asked them to guess features of the word before it came back.

Tested in peoplePeer-reviewed study

What is still unknown

Most of the research was done on English speakers, and it is unclear how far the exact details, such as which partial information is kept, hold in languages built differently.

Learn something?

Brown & McNeill, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior· 1966· DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3

Where to next

Why does a word stop looking like a word if you write it enough times?memoryHow does one word in a question plant a memory of something that never happened?memoryWhy do we remember a long experience by only two moments of it?memory

Want another one worth repeating?

Start with three short discoveries. No sign-up, nothing to pick first.

Surprise me
Browse the topic libraryAbout WatWat, and how sources get checked