dogs still live inside the Chernobyl exclusion zone, including on the grounds of the power plant itself. If they are a single wandering population they are of limited scientific use. If they are separate groups that have stayed put for generations, they become something rarer. So 302 dogs were sampled from the plant, from Chernobyl City, and from sites 15 to 45 kilometers out.
The plant dogs are genetically distinct. , set against purebred and free-breeding dogs worldwide, show the power plant individuals and the Chernobyl City individuals to be distinct from each other. The plant dogs show increased similarity within their own group and greater differentiation from others. Shared ancestral genome segments reveal differences in the extent and timing of western breed .
The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster produced long-term and widespread environmental contamination, and free-roaming dogs have been living inside the resulting exclusion zone ever since, including on the grounds of the power plant. Whether they constitute identifiable populations or one mixing group had never been established.
This study characterized the genetic structure of 302 dogs representing three free-roaming populations: those living within the power plant itself, those in Chernobyl City, and those 15 to 45 kilometers from the disaster site.
Genome-wide profiles, set against purebred and free-breeding dogs worldwide, reveal the power plant individuals and the Chernobyl City individuals to be genetically distinct, with the former showing increased intrapopulation genetic similarity and greater differentiation. Analysis of shared ancestral genome segments highlights differences in the extent and timing of western breed introgression between the groups.
found 15 families, the largest spanning all collection sites within the radioactive exclusion zone, which reflects dogs migrating between the power plant and Chernobyl City. The authors present this as the first characterization of a domestic species at Chernobyl, and are explicit about what it is for. It establishes these dogs as a resource for genetic studies into the effects of long-term, low-dose ionizing radiation. The effects themselves are not what this paper reports.
wat. The dogs living on the power plant grounds are a genetically distinct group, which is what makes them useful rather than merely remarkable.
wat wat
The value is in what it sets up. A domestic species with known, structured populations living under long-term low-dose radiation is a study system nobody could have built deliberately.
How do we know?
Spatola and colleagues characterized the genetic structure of 302 dogs from three free-roaming populations inside the exclusion zone, comparing genome-wide profiles against purebred and free-breeding dogs worldwide and running kinship analysis.
What is still unknown
This paper measures population structure, not radiation effects. It establishes that the dogs are distinguishable groups and makes no claim about what the exposure has done to them.
Learn something?
Where to next
Can a shark give birth without ever meeting a male?genetics
Your dog tilts its head when you talk. What is it doing in that moment?dogs
Was the dog tamed once, or did two separate peoples do it?dogs