← Three short discoveries on WatWat
An empty red running track curving beside a grass field and trees
Sport

Hormone levels change across the menstrual cycle, so it is tempting to expect a training schedule fitted to its . Whole apps are built on that assumption. A review of dozens of studies examined how large the difference actually is. What was found?

Tested in people

A difference too small to schedule around. Across 78 studies, performance may be slightly lower at the start of the phase when bleeding begins. The average size of that difference was , next to what moves performance anyway: sleep, food and stress. was low and the variation between studies large, so the researchers recommended fitting decisions to .

Hormone levels change across the cycle, so it is tempting to build a training schedule by its phases. For that to work, the difference between phases has to be larger than ordinary day-to-day noise.

A review of seventy-eight studies covering nearly twelve hundred participants found that performance may be slightly lower at the start of the phase when bleeding begins, and the average size of the difference was trivial.

Trivial next to what moves performance anyway: sleep, food and stress. On top of that the quality of the evidence was rated low and the variation between studies was large, partly because many of them did not verify the cycle phase with a hormonal test.

So the recommendation is not a rigid schedule but personal tracking. When the variation between women is larger than the average difference between phases, a group average does not predict the individual.

wat. Across 78 studies the average difference between cycle phases was trivial, and the variation between individuals was larger than the rule.

wat wat

Tracking your own feeling and performance can be more useful than a rigid schedule assuming every woman responds the same way.

How do we know?

A systematic review and meta-analysis compared exercise performance between cycle phases across 78 studies covering 1,193 participants.

Tested in peopleReview or meta-analysis

What is still unknown

Many of the studies were small and did not verify the cycle phase well, so confidence in the overall average is low.

Learn something?

McNulty et al., Sports Medicine· 2020· DOI 10.1007/s40279-020-01319-3

Where to next

Does an ice bath after training actually speed up recovery?trainingCoffee before lifting: real strength, or just a feeling of alertness?trainingHow much physical performance is lost after a short night?training

Want another one worth repeating?

Start with three short discoveries. No sign-up, nothing to pick first.

Surprise me
Browse the topic libraryAbout WatWat, and how sources get checked